That is you. Many use it as "I like your idea but not 100% agree with you yet....go on say more and let me think about what my next respond would be for your next comment". The judge is a boomer. Is like asking a gender studies grad student to evaluate AB testing effectiveness for a UI redesign of public survey written in Typescript. If one of the twins committed mass murder with tons of DNA evidence while the other twin is innocent. Both have been able to walk free in many cases. You simply cannot have such ambiquity in contracts offering/signing. You can have ambiguity in the clauses but not at acceptance. Anyway is Canadian. Expected that kind of low quality judgement....quite expected worldwide.
Comments
That is you. Many use it as "I like your idea but not 100% agree with you yet....go on say more and let me think about what my next respond would be for your next comment". The judge is a boomer. Is like asking a gender studies grad student to evaluate AB testing effectiveness for a UI redesign of public survey written in Typescript. If one of the twins committed mass murder with tons of DNA evidence while the other twin is innocent. Both have been able to walk free in many cases. You simply cannot have such ambiquity in contracts offering/signing. You can have ambiguity in the clauses but not at acceptance. Anyway is Canadian. Expected that kind of low quality judgement....quite expected worldwide.