I wonder how many of the more technologically sophisticated students setup p2p networks.
In high school one of the better Calculus students in my class had written a script using his graphics calculator. The script could complete certain classes of problem automatically while showing every step of workings. Kinda like the p2p network: the kids with the skill to set it up probably don’t need any extra help on the exams.
Used to be pretty deep into the TI calculator hacking scene, I know that there were definitely programs/firmware images out there that allowed you to fake clearing the calculator's RAM and archive, as ridiculous as it sounds. But in my high school by the point teachers were manually clearing calculators most students were resorting to cheating other ways rather than advancing the graphing calc cheating arms race.
Decisions on par with blacking out the internet. (But clearly not as severe.)
If your test depends on preventing students from precomputing the answers, your not testing what you think you're testing. (Or what you should be testing as a teacher)
The big issue is it's hard to test the actual problem solving process in math with a multiple choice exam so you're either stuck doing it in higher level classes with less people so you're not drowning in grading or clearing/removing calculators entirely. The option of just not having calculators and formulating the problems so they could be solved without them was the most common solution to that when I was in college. Usually it's relatively easy to select a set of parameters for the problem to make the solution easy to compute numerically.
I'm in the UK and there was nearly no multiple choice exams, both external and internal. Most external exams used scanning software with questions split out to make it faster to mark them. Somehow our teachers managed.
The only multiple choice exams were optional additions the school could purchase, ie: Maths Challenge, benchmarking, career advice...
In the US basically every large exam especially the end of year and college admissions tests (except the essay portion recently added to the SAT when I took it) were all bubble forms. In college it was most common in the large classes that were part of the options for the general education requirements that would use them instead of open ended questions so they could be automatically graded for the 50-100 students who'd be taking each exam. It was also way more common in classes where answers would be numerical rather than say my proofs and logic class where we needed to write out a proof. IMO it was deployed logically where multiple choice made sense it was used and classes where the path to the solution was important they'd not use it.
There was a program you could run on the TI calculators before clearing that did some voodoo magic so that you could memorize some short “binary” program that restored it all. My memory is vague but between clearing and executing this very short executable, it at least appeared to be completely wiped.
IIRC it was an applet that hooked the key shortcuts and menu entries for a wipe, and the really advanced ones would drop you into an imitation shell that appeared as a freshly wiped calculator would, but there was a magic keystroke to drop back to the (untouched) main system.
I have recently learned that the introductory calculus classes at one of our local community colleges bans the use of calculators - any calculators - entirely during exams, and the syllabus and problem sets are accordingly structured in a way that makes using calculators largely redundant.
They tried this when I was in HS, but we resisted on the grounds that our science teachers let us create programs for their classes, and if we erased the memory we'd lose those programs.
There was a 1950s/60s juvenile sci-fi story about a teenager who programmed his dad's lab computer to do his math homework. When the adults caught on to what he was doing, they decided it wasn't cheating because he had to learn the math first in order to write the program.
Sure. But then you (or someone) sells that to other kids for $$$. You might not need it, but they do. All they know is how to put the question in and copy the answer, they've never even seen the code, let alone have developed it
Comments
I wonder how many of the more technologically sophisticated students setup p2p networks.
In high school one of the better Calculus students in my class had written a script using his graphics calculator. The script could complete certain classes of problem automatically while showing every step of workings. Kinda like the p2p network: the kids with the skill to set it up probably don’t need any extra help on the exams.
In high school they cleared our graphing calculators before each exam, it had become too widespread.
Used to be pretty deep into the TI calculator hacking scene, I know that there were definitely programs/firmware images out there that allowed you to fake clearing the calculator's RAM and archive, as ridiculous as it sounds. But in my high school by the point teachers were manually clearing calculators most students were resorting to cheating other ways rather than advancing the graphing calc cheating arms race.
My friend's work around for that was a pixel perfect reproduction of the screen saying the calculator had been cleared.
Decisions on par with blacking out the internet. (But clearly not as severe.)
If your test depends on preventing students from precomputing the answers, your not testing what you think you're testing. (Or what you should be testing as a teacher)
The big issue is it's hard to test the actual problem solving process in math with a multiple choice exam so you're either stuck doing it in higher level classes with less people so you're not drowning in grading or clearing/removing calculators entirely. The option of just not having calculators and formulating the problems so they could be solved without them was the most common solution to that when I was in college. Usually it's relatively easy to select a set of parameters for the problem to make the solution easy to compute numerically.
I'm in the UK and there was nearly no multiple choice exams, both external and internal. Most external exams used scanning software with questions split out to make it faster to mark them. Somehow our teachers managed.
The only multiple choice exams were optional additions the school could purchase, ie: Maths Challenge, benchmarking, career advice...
In the US basically every large exam especially the end of year and college admissions tests (except the essay portion recently added to the SAT when I took it) were all bubble forms. In college it was most common in the large classes that were part of the options for the general education requirements that would use them instead of open ended questions so they could be automatically graded for the 50-100 students who'd be taking each exam. It was also way more common in classes where answers would be numerical rather than say my proofs and logic class where we needed to write out a proof. IMO it was deployed logically where multiple choice made sense it was used and classes where the path to the solution was important they'd not use it.
There was a program you could run on the TI calculators before clearing that did some voodoo magic so that you could memorize some short “binary” program that restored it all. My memory is vague but between clearing and executing this very short executable, it at least appeared to be completely wiped.
IIRC it was an applet that hooked the key shortcuts and menu entries for a wipe, and the really advanced ones would drop you into an imitation shell that appeared as a freshly wiped calculator would, but there was a magic keystroke to drop back to the (untouched) main system.
Edit: found it, or a similar one: https://brandonw.net/calculators/fake/
I have recently learned that the introductory calculus classes at one of our local community colleges bans the use of calculators - any calculators - entirely during exams, and the syllabus and problem sets are accordingly structured in a way that makes using calculators largely redundant.
They tried this when I was in HS, but we resisted on the grounds that our science teachers let us create programs for their classes, and if we erased the memory we'd lose those programs.
There was a 1950s/60s juvenile sci-fi story about a teenager who programmed his dad's lab computer to do his math homework. When the adults caught on to what he was doing, they decided it wasn't cheating because he had to learn the math first in order to write the program.
Exactly. Made several similar ones and had a 'lock' screen that was blank until you input the right key combination, or exited otherwise.
Programming it meant I knew the content well enough to never need it.
Sure. But then you (or someone) sells that to other kids for $$$. You might not need it, but they do. All they know is how to put the question in and copy the answer, they've never even seen the code, let alone have developed it
Thank god they can just copy the program that the smart kid wrote.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sneakernet