Thanks. The multiple queries per search idea isn't a bad one, but not enough people have asked for it where it makes sense to implement it just yet. And as someone else mentioned, the results are already a bit overwhelming. Having 3,000 or 4,500 or 6,000 results vs the current 1,500 isn't going to help that. I think my time is better spent exploring ways to organize the current results. But if there is demand, I'll meet it.
And yeah, agreed about the Mormon association. They really need to change their name =X
Add me to the list of folk wanting to search for multiple/combinations of words. Two would be sufficient for me. There are a lot of noun + verb combinations (and perhaps noun plus adjective) that make for a good base for a domain name.
Regardless, the tool as it stands is excellent. Thanks.
Comments
Thanks. The multiple queries per search idea isn't a bad one, but not enough people have asked for it where it makes sense to implement it just yet. And as someone else mentioned, the results are already a bit overwhelming. Having 3,000 or 4,500 or 6,000 results vs the current 1,500 isn't going to help that. I think my time is better spent exploring ways to organize the current results. But if there is demand, I'll meet it.
And yeah, agreed about the Mormon association. They really need to change their name =X
Add me to the list of folk wanting to search for multiple/combinations of words. Two would be sufficient for me. There are a lot of noun + verb combinations (and perhaps noun plus adjective) that make for a good base for a domain name.
Regardless, the tool as it stands is excellent. Thanks.