Your comment history is fairly LLM skeptic. I'm not sure what that has to do with anything.
The only difference in this instance is that I've actually tested GPT-4 on translations while you haven't.
If you're going to rag on a product's capabilities on x, you'd think the least you could do is use it for x first.
It's obvious you haven't lol. Your comment reads like someone who hasn't and you never bothered saying you had but just didn't agree on the issue of uality. Even now, your defense isn't "but i have", it's "how do you know i haven't ?", a tell tell sign of someone who actually hasn't bothered.
Comments
Your comment history is fairly LLM skeptic. I'm not sure what that has to do with anything. The only difference in this instance is that I've actually tested GPT-4 on translations while you haven't.
If you're going to rag on a product's capabilities on x, you'd think the least you could do is use it for x first.
How on earth do you know people have or haven’t done?
Are you spying on everyone ?
It's obvious you haven't lol. Your comment reads like someone who hasn't and you never bothered saying you had but just didn't agree on the issue of uality. Even now, your defense isn't "but i have", it's "how do you know i haven't ?", a tell tell sign of someone who actually hasn't bothered.