Comment on The Worst Is Ahead (Roubini)Comments−joestrickler17y+1 for print version.Print version == less size per paragraph in bytes and visual overhead. This is especially good for mobile browsing, and I can't think of one instance where I would have missed something in the "web" version.−fallentimes17yUnfortunately internet writers are mostly paid with ads. I see Forbes, however, was wise enough to include an ad on the print version.−joestrickler17yMy comment was aimed at HNers, who graciously post the link directly to the print version from time to time. Just wanted to encourage this :).−fallentimes17yHaha yeah HNer's aren't exactly the type of people who click on ads.−crabapple17yyes. i wish most sites would go on a markup diet.
Comments
+1 for print version.
Print version == less size per paragraph in bytes and visual overhead. This is especially good for mobile browsing, and I can't think of one instance where I would have missed something in the "web" version.
Unfortunately internet writers are mostly paid with ads. I see Forbes, however, was wise enough to include an ad on the print version.
My comment was aimed at HNers, who graciously post the link directly to the print version from time to time. Just wanted to encourage this :).
Haha yeah HNer's aren't exactly the type of people who click on ads.
yes. i wish most sites would go on a markup diet.