Skip to content

Comment on America divided Korea – then came warparent

Comments

There's only one japan, but apparently there were two, opposed, policies: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_Course

(I had been thinking of the "short 20th century" as being 1914-1991, but I guess korea is an example of frozen conflict which has outlasted it)

Indeed so, partition was only a fall back option if compliant government couldn't be installed, ala Marcos in the Philippines, Suharto in Indonesia etc.

US actually also wanted a United China, but didn't find it within themselves to indefinitely support Chiang Kai-shek (probably rightly from the US POV, Chiang was a China nationalist through and through and would not have been compliant to anyone) against the Reds, probably because it would have required using nuclear weapons on the mainland. Came close though, killing millions wasn't a problem, then or now

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.