Comment on Modern Image Processing Algorithms Implementation in CComments−Iwan-Zotow3ybetter than OpenCV ?−spookie3yThe focus seems to make a smaller (not better) OpenCV−cozzyd3yeasier to integrate into C-based stuff, probably...though unfortunately doesn't seem to make it easy to work without dynamic allocation, which makes it not as useful as it could be...−realPtolemy3yCurious to know as well−slicktux3yBetter in what sense?−Iwan-Zotow3yI mean OpenCV is C library, lots of well tested algorithms, Python binding, lots of users, docs, examples, you name itTo be considered as potential use, it should either do something which OpenCV is not doing, or do things (a lot) better.I mean, I used OpenCV, shall I move to that lib? OpenCV is pretty much standard C imaging library, anyone working with images knowns about OpenCV−kilpikaarna3yOpenCV is C++ (though there are 3rd party C bindings)
Comments
better than OpenCV ?
The focus seems to make a smaller (not better) OpenCV
easier to integrate into C-based stuff, probably...though unfortunately doesn't seem to make it easy to work without dynamic allocation, which makes it not as useful as it could be...
Curious to know as well
Better in what sense?
I mean OpenCV is C library, lots of well tested algorithms, Python binding, lots of users, docs, examples, you name it
To be considered as potential use, it should either do something which OpenCV is not doing, or do things (a lot) better.
I mean, I used OpenCV, shall I move to that lib? OpenCV is pretty much standard C imaging library, anyone working with images knowns about OpenCV
OpenCV is C++ (though there are 3rd party C bindings)