Skip to content

Comment on Why is C++ still a very popular language in quantitative finance?parent

Comments

To be fair, C++ is a mess. It is, however, a very capable mess with extremely broad adoption and compatibility on pretty much every platform anywhere.

Yes, learning C++ is a pain. And it will bite even its expert handlers pretty badly occasionally. But the kind of maintenance overhead suggested by the stackexchange question really isn't there. For non-trivial code (as in the example here) the maintenance and correctness burden of the problem itself is going to be far higher than that of the programming environment.

So yes: just say no to C++ for web server middleware, system maintenance scripting, probably most GUI work, etc... But for the truly hard stuff, I honestly don't see much advantage to anything else in particular. And as pointed out earlier, C++ can be deployed as a straightfoward program or shared library on everything with zero dependencies, and that's a HUGE advantage vs. languages with elaborate runtimes.

"To be fair, C++ is a mess. It is, however, a very capable mess with extremely broad adoption and compatibility on pretty much every platform anywhere."

C++, IMO, is not alone in that: XML, Unicode, multi-threaded programming using condition variables and mutexes, integer modulo arithmetic, date/time libraries, IEEE floating point, etc.

The good thing of all of them is that they solve complex real-world problems. The 'bad' thing is that they are more complex than other technologies that solve the same problem, partly.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.