Then perhaps that's the problem - as per the guidelines "assume good faith".
"Keeping your people healthy should just be a given".
Following basic language pragmatics
Quite frankly, that's rubbish; here you are taking the least charitable interpretation of the parent comment.
Most people would have interpreted that as excluding those outside of a country's borders - its region of direct control.
You misinterpreted my comment, where I said "citizens" in much the same way.
In every comment you made in the thread, you seem to have taken minor issues of phrasing and used them to wildly misinterpret comments in the least charitable way imaginable.
My previous comment hits the nail on the head, and you've done the same damned thing with your latest response.
Comments
Then perhaps that's the problem - as per the guidelines "assume good faith".
Quite frankly, that's rubbish; here you are taking the least charitable interpretation of the parent comment.
Most people would have interpreted that as excluding those outside of a country's borders - its region of direct control.
You misinterpreted my comment, where I said "citizens" in much the same way.
My previous comment hits the nail on the head, and you've done the same damned thing with your latest response.