Comment on It's not just statistics: GPT-4 does reasonparentComments−flandish3yI’d call it “meeting spec as defined.”And that’s the whole problem with this AI / llm / gpt bubble:Nobody has scientifically or even simply defined the spec, bounds, or even temporal scope on what it “means” to “get to ai.”Corporations are LOVING that because they can keep profiting off this bubble.
Comments
I’d call it “meeting spec as defined.”
And that’s the whole problem with this AI / llm / gpt bubble:
Nobody has scientifically or even simply defined the spec, bounds, or even temporal scope on what it “means” to “get to ai.”
Corporations are LOVING that because they can keep profiting off this bubble.