Yes but the truly immoral part is designing cities and infrastructure such that attempting to move around them using non-polluting (and fitness enhancing!) modes of transport is unsafe or unrealistic for so many.
Well our grandparents unfortunately sold us down the river so we have to deal with the shitty hand we have, and until we undo that damage, WFH is a good harm-reduction method.
Comments
I have a different feeling about the morality of in-person work:
Forcing regular, superfluous, commuting is immoral from a climate-change perspective.
Yes but the truly immoral part is designing cities and infrastructure such that attempting to move around them using non-polluting (and fitness enhancing!) modes of transport is unsafe or unrealistic for so many.
Well our grandparents unfortunately sold us down the river so we have to deal with the shitty hand we have, and until we undo that damage, WFH is a good harm-reduction method.