Comment on GitHub IncidentparentComments−willsmith723yI dunno about "should", that feels like overkill. Expecting to get something like a 99.99% SLA shouldn't be unreasonable to expect out of a hosted solution−jamal-kumar3yA seperate git remote isn't incredibly unreasonable either - Even if it's just something on localhost in case of scenarios like this oneGithub being down for a bit shouldn't disrupt your work flow−maccard3yGitHub being down blocks all of our CI pipelines, for example.−bombolo3yyou should be able to run the basic tests locally.
Comments
I dunno about "should", that feels like overkill. Expecting to get something like a 99.99% SLA shouldn't be unreasonable to expect out of a hosted solution
A seperate git remote isn't incredibly unreasonable either - Even if it's just something on localhost in case of scenarios like this one
Github being down for a bit shouldn't disrupt your work flow
GitHub being down blocks all of our CI pipelines, for example.
you should be able to run the basic tests locally.