Skip to content

Comment on GitHub is downparent

Comments

Our on-prem GH enterprise hasn't gone down in the last year.

Additionally any potentially disruptive work like upgrades etc can be scheduled outside of business hours so that they won't impact users

In general, paying GH tends to be much cheaper than employing a team of SREs that'll keep your on-prem Git instance up and running 24/7 (esp. including things like backups, disaster recovery, and similar good practices necessary for any enterprise-ready SaaS).

Something tells me that if you can schedule upgrades "outside of business hours", your scale is small (because in a global company, it's always "business hours" somewhere), which makes the cost argument even more prominent.

You don't employ a team of SRE's with the sole day-job of git maintenance though, your existing SRE/sysadmin team manages it.

And any large business will already be doing Backups, DR etc for their existing systems.

any large business will already be doing Backups, DR etc for their existing systems

Any? Are you sure?

Lol don't crush their optimism, the real world will do it for you in due time

Been doing it for 20 years so far.

If you work in a large business that needs git but doesn't have backups and has no disaster recovery plan at all you're going to have much bigger things to worry about than a git repo being offline.

I self-host Subversion and haven’t had an unplanned outage in more than a decade :) (almost two decades?)

How’s your experience with Subversion? What kind of content do store in SVN, BTW?

I really like it. I keep source code, 3rd party libraries, images, binary build output and installers. I can easily go back and debug and crash a customer ever sees because I have all the binaries and debugging files.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.