Skip to content

Comment on How did climate doomsters get the Great Barrier Reef so wrong?parent

Comments

One crying-wolf person? That's "the environmentalists"?

The data (not hyperbole) was that the reef was in trouble and in decline. It continues to be in trouble and in decline.

"Begin recovering after disturbances" is double-talk for "continues it's alarming decline." A bit of coral growing over the sterile corpses of hundreds of miles of dead reef is maybe romantic and hopeful. But not anything to justify the "recovery" word. Mocking science for a sound-byte by one academic is corrosive nonsense.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.