The writer was fine with associating their online blog writing with subscription fees, locking content behind paywalls and so on 10 months ago.
So they were fine with monetization in a scenario when it benefited them, and against when the scenario, AI assisted writing, wasn’t as favourable for them.
You are saying that because the writer signed up to a paid blogging service, and paid for their own domain, their opinion on how AI may replace humans is not valid?
This is nonsense, personal opinions can neither be valid nor invalid by definition.
They are not against monetization, you have made that leap. They are against AI replacing humans simply because it will be cheaper. Your comparison is flawed.
They are not against monetization, you have made that leap. They are against AI replacing humans simply because it will be cheaper. Your comparison is flawed.
If they are fine with more expensive AI replacing humans, instead of cheaper AI, then that seems to be an even more objectionable position?
I doubt they have such bizarre views. But it’s possible the writer could have incoherent thoughts.
For me, the most sensible reading is that they’re against any monetization of AI writing period. Not that they’re fine with AI writing if it’s beyond what most people can afford.
If they are fine with more expensive AI replacing humans, instead of cheaper AI, then that seems to be an even more objectionable position?..I doubt they have such bizarre views. But it’s possible the writer could have incoherent thoughts.
I am not sure if you are being willfully obtuse, serious, or comedic here, but you made me smile either way, thank you.
So they were fine with monetization in a scenario when it benefited them, and against when the scenario, AI assisted writing, wasn’t as favourable for them.
Yes. So what? Not every business is identical. Some businesses are more greedy and ruthless than others. Some provide more societal benefits than others.
When a smaller business starts openly declaiming against the system they benefited from 10 months ago, because shadier businesses are competing them out of the market, it tends to raise eyebrows.
Yes. So what? Not every business is identical. Some businesses are more greedy and ruthless than others. Some provide more societal benefits than others.
This was written in the context of your analogy of different businesses competing.
Comments
The writer was fine with associating their online blog writing with subscription fees, locking content behind paywalls and so on 10 months ago.
So they were fine with monetization in a scenario when it benefited them, and against when the scenario, AI assisted writing, wasn’t as favourable for them.
This is nonsense, personal opinions can neither be valid nor invalid by definition.
They are not against monetization, you have made that leap. They are against AI replacing humans simply because it will be cheaper. Your comparison is flawed.
If they are fine with more expensive AI replacing humans, instead of cheaper AI, then that seems to be an even more objectionable position?
I doubt they have such bizarre views. But it’s possible the writer could have incoherent thoughts.
For me, the most sensible reading is that they’re against any monetization of AI writing period. Not that they’re fine with AI writing if it’s beyond what most people can afford.
I am not sure if you are being willfully obtuse, serious, or comedic here, but you made me smile either way, thank you.
I was surprised and confused too, I hadn’t even considered the possibility!
Yes. So what? Not every business is identical. Some businesses are more greedy and ruthless than others. Some provide more societal benefits than others.
When a smaller business starts openly declaiming against the system they benefited from 10 months ago, because shadier businesses are competing them out of the market, it tends to raise eyebrows.
Why not declaim directly at the shady businesses?
I don't understand your point. It doesn't seem relevant to the article.
This was written in the context of your analogy of different businesses competing.