I'm pretty sure this is just trying to stir people up, but we have lots of evidence that memory unsafety is the cause of the majority of vulnerabilities in widely deployed systems that are written in unsafe languages, and these vulnerabilities are often much more severe.
Refusing to accept or acknowledge scientific evidence is something that I would not expect from a security expert (or any expert).
Comments
I'm pretty sure this is just trying to stir people up, but we have lots of evidence that memory unsafety is the cause of the majority of vulnerabilities in widely deployed systems that are written in unsafe languages, and these vulnerabilities are often much more severe.
Refusing to accept or acknowledge scientific evidence is something that I would not expect from a security expert (or any expert).