Skip to content

Comment on Babylon.js 6.0parent

Comments

My wife did a lot of research into this when we picked an engine for our website and she found that the API of ThreeJS breaks backwards compatibility a lot, while Babylon is exactly the opposite. Babylon also has vastly superior documentation and doesn't seem to suffer from lag spikes as much. However, it's an oldschool API (did I mention they really value backwards compatibility?) and requires quite a bit of learning to get going. Also, it's three times the size of ThreeJS, so bandwidth optimization is absolutely required.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.