Skip to content

Comment on Ask HN: Have any notable companies failed because of poor code?parent

Comments

It didn't collapse entirely - but by all accounts, it was a major failure.

They're still going pretty strong, from what I see and hear ... IOW, they handled that failure relatively well

You can spin it that way if you want.

It was a good chunk of money out the door for them, in any case.

it's not "spin" :)

they're haven't gone out of business, and show no signs of doing so for the foreseeable future :)

You keep dialing back the definition of "fail" to mean "to go out of business."

In common usage its meaning is far broader -- it can also mean e.g. "to screw up spectacularly" (in a way that cost the company very significantly, even if it isn't forced out of business as a result).

OP asked about a "company failing"

You're the one twisting that into a "a failure which may or may not have been recovered from" :)

You can read it however you want.

But in that context, the meaning was clearly open-ended.

I read it the way it's written: "have any notable companies failed"

Not "have any notable companies had a failure"

Big difference there, friend :)

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.