Skip to content

Comment on Why don't we define “imaginary” numbers for every “impossibility”? (2012)parent

Comments

Thanks, this definition does seem problematic. In any case, it is not the only possible definition and in a/0=c, c does not have to be defined as a real number. We can define it as similarly to complex number with new rules that do not collide with existing reals.

There's a couple of mentions in other comments about the Riemann Sphere (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemann_sphere) which does define division by zero, but sacrifices the numbers forming a field under addition and multiplication.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.