Skip to content

Comment on Pausing AI Developments Isn't Enough. We Need to Shut It All Downparent

Comments

I'm fairly certain that an LLM alone will not independently start taking actions and pursuing goals and causing harm. That's not how LLMs work, as you and I both know.

I'm not confident I can say the same about, say: an LLM calling itself from within an infinite loop in which the LLM is asked to predict actions that will [eg. add money into a bank account], and then to write code that executes those actions, then to examine the results of those actions and update its plan. (This takes no additional breakthrough in AI architecture, only an increase in the reliability of GPT for it to become practical. It is basically a summary of the AutoGPT project).

I don't know if LLMs are anywhere close to any part of what goes on inside the human thought process. But I am sure that evolution was able to stumble upon the human thought process. In 2003 I was quite confident that was forever beyond the reach of humans to program into a computer, but in 2023 I am far less certain. I think human cognition is gradually becoming less of a mystery.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.