The AI doomism will help no one. Bing search is a good example. Very good simulation of an average human. Sometime same as hysterical as humans online...
The thing is it is a simulation. The AI however smart it will be, will miss something very important for someone to want to eradicate humanity. It will miss the "will" and the erratic harmonal storms of our body and brain. It will miss the drive to want something. On the other hand, a good simulation of an average or even psychotic human on an AI capable to make this simulation smarter then all other humans, can be dangerous to humanity. Thus: STOP FEEDING AI with our biases and behavioral data, stop feeding it with the chat data and the literature data and the tones of online trash which is posted every day all around the internet. Stop feeding it with the data which will make it possible to simulate an average human. 32K context and possibility to focus on 3-4 key-points of the conversation now, will soon (like 2 years from now) change and will turn into 64k and 7-8 key-points. This is still not enough to build a long term strategy to eradicate humanity.
The AI however smart it will be, will miss something very important for someone to want to eradicate humanity. It will miss the "will" and the erratic harmonal storms of our body and brain. It will miss the drive to want something.
AI wouldn't need that to win at scale, I don't think it would play Drunken Kung Fu Master against humanity but rather perform millions of time efficient, calculated movements a'la StarCraft. Otherwise I agree these are traits that are beneficial for us to fight back. Don't mind me, just speculating.
Humanity got on the top of the food chain, not only because it is smarter and can turn predators into prey. Humans have a will to do so. Even animals have a will and biological needs. AI can't have it unless it simulates it. That's about it.
Comments
The AI doomism will help no one. Bing search is a good example. Very good simulation of an average human. Sometime same as hysterical as humans online... The thing is it is a simulation. The AI however smart it will be, will miss something very important for someone to want to eradicate humanity. It will miss the "will" and the erratic harmonal storms of our body and brain. It will miss the drive to want something. On the other hand, a good simulation of an average or even psychotic human on an AI capable to make this simulation smarter then all other humans, can be dangerous to humanity. Thus: STOP FEEDING AI with our biases and behavioral data, stop feeding it with the chat data and the literature data and the tones of online trash which is posted every day all around the internet. Stop feeding it with the data which will make it possible to simulate an average human. 32K context and possibility to focus on 3-4 key-points of the conversation now, will soon (like 2 years from now) change and will turn into 64k and 7-8 key-points. This is still not enough to build a long term strategy to eradicate humanity.
AI wouldn't need that to win at scale, I don't think it would play Drunken Kung Fu Master against humanity but rather perform millions of time efficient, calculated movements a'la StarCraft. Otherwise I agree these are traits that are beneficial for us to fight back. Don't mind me, just speculating.
Humanity got on the top of the food chain, not only because it is smarter and can turn predators into prey. Humans have a will to do so. Even animals have a will and biological needs. AI can't have it unless it simulates it. That's about it.