I do not think so. If a true AGI were to select its own version of meaning (paperclips or marbles) would it not select something along the lines of “more knowledge of the universe in which I find myself”?
It is presumably going to have superintelligence, so let’s give it/them a better and more plausible meaning; something other than paperclips, marbles, or von Neumann machines.
"Knowledge of the universe" is just as dangerous a terminal goal as "maximize paperclips". To paraphrase Yudkowsky, you are made from atoms, which could be used to build the super-ultra-large particle collider.
No, I disagree. More knowledge equals more diverse dynamic structures and interactions—more “good” entropy. That covaries with higher diversity, not more paperclips.
Comments
I do not think so. If a true AGI were to select its own version of meaning (paperclips or marbles) would it not select something along the lines of “more knowledge of the universe in which I find myself”? It is presumably going to have superintelligence, so let’s give it/them a better and more plausible meaning; something other than paperclips, marbles, or von Neumann machines.
"Knowledge of the universe" is just as dangerous a terminal goal as "maximize paperclips". To paraphrase Yudkowsky, you are made from atoms, which could be used to build the super-ultra-large particle collider.
No, I disagree. More knowledge equals more diverse dynamic structures and interactions—more “good” entropy. That covaries with higher diversity, not more paperclips.