Comment on VeriSign hit by hackersparentComments−joshuahedlund14yNo but I re-read that sentence three times because of how poorly it was written. I don't think I've ever read a news article where a quoted person's description bridged two facts with the phrase "and before that".−oconnore14y<Exclamation>, said <identity and credentials>. "<Explanation>".I don't see anything wrong with that.−joshuahedlund14yYes, that is standard. This is just redundant and sounds like a run-on:<Exclamation>, said <identity and credentials and before that other credentials>. "<Explanation>".
Comments
No but I re-read that sentence three times because of how poorly it was written. I don't think I've ever read a news article where a quoted person's description bridged two facts with the phrase "and before that".
<Exclamation>, said <identity and credentials>. "<Explanation>".
I don't see anything wrong with that.
Yes, that is standard. This is just redundant and sounds like a run-on:
<Exclamation>, said <identity and credentials and before that other credentials>. "<Explanation>".