Skip to content

Comment on AI Labs Urged to Pump the Brakes in Open Letterparent

Comments

Also, the letter only presents threats.

Part of the ethical consideration needs to be the opportunity cost a six month delay could cause.

As an example, let's say that GPT-N will cure cancer.

Over a six month period that's at least 5 million people dead if the date it arrives and cures cancers broadly was pushed by that long.

What about negotiating foreign policy treaties to prevent war, or identifying a way to reverse climate changes, or any number of other positive effects?

The fact the letter even positions 'should' such an advanced AI exist as a legitimate question I find pretty gross.

Should we hold back the progress of intelligent life in the universe out of the ego of humanity?

I get superintelligence is an unsettling idea.

But inherent to that name is an indication that there's a seat at the debate table that's currently vacant which might have important and interesting things to say on the subject, and anyone suggesting aborting it is a valid course of action (particularly given the myriad of existential threats we already face from fellow humans) I can only regard as being quite far from super.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.