Anyone know why the first comparison image is rotated 90 degrees for both ThumbHash and BlurHash versions? Is this a limitation of the type of encoding or just a mistake? All other comparison images match source rotation.
That's the only image with a non-zero EXIF orientation. Which probably means you're using an older browser (e.g. Chrome started respecting EXIF orientation in version 81+, which I think came out 3 years ago?). You'd have to update your browser for it to display correctly.
Comments
Anyone know why the first comparison image is rotated 90 degrees for both ThumbHash and BlurHash versions? Is this a limitation of the type of encoding or just a mistake? All other comparison images match source rotation.
That's the only image with a non-zero EXIF orientation. Which probably means you're using an older browser (e.g. Chrome started respecting EXIF orientation in version 81+, which I think came out 3 years ago?). You'd have to update your browser for it to display correctly.
Yep. Here's a good description of the issue, with examples that will show if the browser is the problem: https://magnushoff.com/articles/jpeg-orientation/