Great article, thanks for sharing. I would have loved more information about the acquisition process (maybe even including your initial email) because this is the most interesting part to me. I would also like to know where the final price settled between your initial offer and the 5x rebuttal (no need for actual price, just a reference).
On a side note, amazing job with the redesign. The new hittail landing page looks great. One thing I noticed however was that you have an extra checkmark on the last row of the pricing page that doesn't seem to correlate with anything. Done on purpose?
Cool; I'll try to cover the things you raised in part 2 or 3.
>>On a side note, amazing job with the redesign. The new hittail landing page looks great.
Thanks!
>>One thing I noticed however was that you have an extra checkmark on the last row of the pricing page that doesn't seem to correlate with anything. Done on purpose?
LOL...that's awesome. I'm not sure how no one else (including me) has noticed that. Removing it now; thanks for pointing it out :-)
Comments
Great article, thanks for sharing. I would have loved more information about the acquisition process (maybe even including your initial email) because this is the most interesting part to me. I would also like to know where the final price settled between your initial offer and the 5x rebuttal (no need for actual price, just a reference).
On a side note, amazing job with the redesign. The new hittail landing page looks great. One thing I noticed however was that you have an extra checkmark on the last row of the pricing page that doesn't seem to correlate with anything. Done on purpose?
Cool; I'll try to cover the things you raised in part 2 or 3.
>>On a side note, amazing job with the redesign. The new hittail landing page looks great.
Thanks!
>>One thing I noticed however was that you have an extra checkmark on the last row of the pricing page that doesn't seem to correlate with anything. Done on purpose?
LOL...that's awesome. I'm not sure how no one else (including me) has noticed that. Removing it now; thanks for pointing it out :-)