Her criticism doesn't have much substance though, she says explicitly she can't follow one of the main arguments of the paper. I skimmed the paper myself, and it is quite esoteric, but it doesn't seem like nonsense to me. I wish she would react with more curiosity about it, and actually dig into it a little!
Comments
She already panned it on twitter.
https://twitter.com/skdh/status/1626113544339980291
Her criticism doesn't have much substance though, she says explicitly she can't follow one of the main arguments of the paper. I skimmed the paper myself, and it is quite esoteric, but it doesn't seem like nonsense to me. I wish she would react with more curiosity about it, and actually dig into it a little!
Here's (the two biggest parts of) the firehose. Have a long drink. React with curiosity to all of them:
https://arxiv.org/list/astro-ph.CO/recent
https://arxiv.org/list/gr-qc/recent
You don't have to just wish.
https://backreaction.blogspot.com/p/talk-to-physicist_27.htm...