Skip to content

Comment on A Brief History of Random Numbersparent

Comments

Wasn't xoshiro256+ mostly weak in the lower bits, and recommended to use to generate floating point numbers?

I suppose that this is probably indicative of a more fundamental weakness, but for reference the upper bits should be way higher quality that the Messene Twister (As that one fails PractRand while the upper bits of xoshiro256+ don't IIRC)

Yes, but it is also weak in terms of seed correlation, which makes xoshiro256+x8 weak in many more bits.

That said, there are certainly use-cases for it! I just like the idea that we can have our cake and eat it too: something closer to the Pareto frontier, that doesn’t have those caveats, and yet is faster.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.