I tried Turbo Prolog[1] back in the 1980s. I could never figure out how to get it to do file I/O at that time, so I got frustrated and gave up. Even now, it looks fairly hopeless as a language.
Is there a modern example of the language that can do file I/O? To me, if you can't do I/O, there's no point to a language. It's why Standard Pascal lost so much ground to Turbo Pascal with it's excellent I/O support.
I find it hard to parse your comment in good faith. You seem to say that Prolog is hopeless as a language because you couldn't find out how to do file I/O in Turbo Prolog in the '80s, when file I/O is both entirely possible and very simple to do in Prolog. It's not the fault of the language if you couldn't figure it out 40 years ago.
Edit: the Turbo Prolog manual you linked to lists the file_str/2 predicate for file I/O on page 73. Did you try that?.
I installed SWI prolog, and I can not figure out how to run the example code I found on the internet.
Here's hello.pl:
main :- write('This is a sample Prolog program'),
write(' This program is written into hello.pl file').
Trying to run hello.pl
Welcome to SWI-Prolog (threaded, 64 bits, version 9.0.4)
SWI-Prolog comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free software.
Please run ?- license. for legal details.
.
For online help and background, visit https://www.swi-prolog.org
For built-in help, use ?- help(Topic). or ?- apropos(Word).
.
1 ?- [hello.pl].
ERROR: Type error: `dict' expected, found `hello' (an atom)
ERROR: In:
ERROR: [13] throw(error(type_error(dict,hello),_15432))
ERROR: [11] '.'(hello,pl,_15466) at c:/program files/swipl/boot/dicts.pl:57
ERROR: [10] '<meta-call>'(user:user: ...) <foreign>
ERROR: [9] toplevel_call(user:user: ...) at c:/program files/swipl/boot/toplevel.pl:1173
ERROR:
ERROR: Note: some frames are missing due to last-call optimization.
ERROR: Re-run your program in debug mode (:- debug.) to get more detail.
2 ?-
Google seems to be no help at this point, it's taken about 2 hours to get to this point. This is typical of the frustration I've experienced in my past attempts to understand this language.
You can express a bunch of facts and rules, great... but you can't actually write code to act on them, apparently. 8(
-----------
Edit -- Success has been achieved
C:\Program Files\swipl>bin\swipl -s hello.pl -g main -g halt
This is a sample Prolog program This program is written into hello.pl file
C:\Program Files\swipl>
----------
Even better... here's hello2.pl
main :- write('This is a sample Prolog program'),
write(' This program is written into hello.pl file').
.
?- main.
?- halt.
and it works as expected
C:\Program Files\swipl>bin\swipl hello2.pl
This is a sample Prolog program This program is written into hello.pl file
C:\Program Files\swipl>
:- use_module(library(readutil)).
readmyfile(Filename) :-
open(Filename,read, Stream),
read_line_to_string(Stream,Input),
write("The line is:"), nl,
write(Input), nl,
close(Stream),
%or slurp the whole thing
read_file_to_string(Filename,WholeFile,[encoding(text)]),
%lets use the formatted output predicate
format("The file ~s has the following contents ~n~s ~n",[Filename,WholeFile]).
then launch swi and
?- [hello].
true.
?- readmyfile('hello.pl').
The line is:
:- use_module(library(readutil)).
The file hello.pl has the following contents
...
...
...
true.
Comments
I tried Turbo Prolog[1] back in the 1980s. I could never figure out how to get it to do file I/O at that time, so I got frustrated and gave up. Even now, it looks fairly hopeless as a language.
Is there a modern example of the language that can do file I/O? To me, if you can't do I/O, there's no point to a language. It's why Standard Pascal lost so much ground to Turbo Pascal with it's excellent I/O support.
[1] https://ia802902.us.archive.org/1/items/bitsavers_borlandtur...
I finally got a hello world program that works like I expect it would, here's hello.pl
That shouldn't have taken 35 years. ;-)Tells more about you than about Prolog.
Ok lay it on me
Why couldn't you do file I/O? Of course there's file I/O in Prolog, and I'd be really surprised if there wasn't in Turbo Prolog
Here's I/O in SWI-Prolog:
https://www.swi-prolog.org/pldoc/man?section=IO
I find it hard to parse your comment in good faith. You seem to say that Prolog is hopeless as a language because you couldn't find out how to do file I/O in Turbo Prolog in the '80s, when file I/O is both entirely possible and very simple to do in Prolog. It's not the fault of the language if you couldn't figure it out 40 years ago.
Edit: the Turbo Prolog manual you linked to lists the file_str/2 predicate for file I/O on page 73. Did you try that?.
I installed SWI prolog, and I can not figure out how to run the example code I found on the internet.
Here's hello.pl:
Trying to run hello.pl Google seems to be no help at this point, it's taken about 2 hours to get to this point. This is typical of the frustration I've experienced in my past attempts to understand this language.You can express a bunch of facts and rules, great... but you can't actually write code to act on them, apparently. 8(
-----------
Edit -- Success has been achieved
----------Even better... here's hello2.pl
and it works as expectedit is just
the '.' has syntactic meaning outside of quotes.now to demonstrate file i/o:
we make a file hello.pl that has
then launch swi andCan I ask, why did you type that?