I'm not arguing that the content of the article is incorrect, I'm arguing that the title and first paragraph of are misleading, and this didn't particularly encourage me to continue reading. Positioning the words "music" and "noise" as opposites is fundamentally incorrect. Since the article is about music theory, the author should know better. Anyways, I'm getting downvoted so I'll just give up my argument; it's okay for someone to be wrong about music but not about programming languages or physics. Noted.
I don't think the title is wrong or for that matter misleading and to be honest I don't think you thought that either. You just though the article was about something else.
If you really think the title was misleading then why not say that?
Comments
I'm not arguing that the content of the article is incorrect, I'm arguing that the title and first paragraph of are misleading, and this didn't particularly encourage me to continue reading. Positioning the words "music" and "noise" as opposites is fundamentally incorrect. Since the article is about music theory, the author should know better. Anyways, I'm getting downvoted so I'll just give up my argument; it's okay for someone to be wrong about music but not about programming languages or physics. Noted.
I don't think the title is wrong or for that matter misleading and to be honest I don't think you thought that either. You just though the article was about something else.
If you really think the title was misleading then why not say that?