It's difficult to take this article seriously given the terrible grammar and obvious technical errors, often in the same sentence, e.g. "The researchers then combined 96 bits make [sic] one byte of data..."; presumably "bits" should be "atoms". Such errors make me question whether anything in the article is accurate or being interpreted correctly.
Comments
It's difficult to take this article seriously given the terrible grammar and obvious technical errors, often in the same sentence, e.g. "The researchers then combined 96 bits make [sic] one byte of data..."; presumably "bits" should be "atoms". Such errors make me question whether anything in the article is accurate or being interpreted correctly.