Skip to content

Comment on Pwned or Bot

Comments

Wouldn't bad actors just push their fake email addressess to haveibeenpwned in fake leaks? Steps:

1- periodically set up a legitimate looking service, possibly proxying real services. 2- wait a year or two for your fake service to premiate throughout the www and for seach engines to index it. 3. Mix your bot email addresses with legitimate previously pwned addresses. 4- proclame "woe is me, for thyself hasth been pwned"

You can set up this process so that you can inject a couple 100k bot email addresses periodically every couple of months.

This is an incredibly shortsighted idea with the potential to hurt a lot of innocent people.

It is going to happen, and some people will make money off it by farming such addresses, but it raises the time and the cost to obtain a plausible email address for fraud.

At that point you'd be better off making those emails and signing up to a bunch of services. Bot emails aren't fresh for 2 years, and if they are somebody isn't doing their job properly.

I think the point is bot emails shouldn't be fresh.

Same way some people just set up businesses with random names in tax-shelter territories and sell the company 10 years later to add a sense if legitimacy.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.