I suppose it would be akin to a difficult to spot false positive where the person who decided (say, customs) doubles down and you end up having to argue your case.
True. But you can still argue with most humans and possibly succeed in proving your case. Arguing with ChatGPT is seemingly the same as arguing with a (extremely advanced and 'intelligent') calculator.
Comments
I suppose it would be akin to a difficult to spot false positive where the person who decided (say, customs) doubles down and you end up having to argue your case.
True. But you can still argue with most humans and possibly succeed in proving your case. Arguing with ChatGPT is seemingly the same as arguing with a (extremely advanced and 'intelligent') calculator.