Skip to content

Comment on Never create Ruby strings longer than 23 charactersparent

Comments

I work with Pat and kicked around some title ideas with him yesterday. It's interesting to see a title that he created out of a sense of fun and excitement being perceived as linkbait. I can see why that perception would arise, but I hope people think of him as a good writer trying to have fun rather than some dude writing linkbait titles trying to get attention.

Some other title ideas:

* 23 characters ought to be enough for anybody

* 23: How Twitter could have solved their ruby scaling problem

Heh. I would have gone with "Ruby Optimizations: Why short strings are an order of magnitude faster" or something.

No better. It is becoming a real problem if factual accurate titles don't go through. Imagine, I'm on a phone in China, most articles never load, I have to rely on title and comments to now what we are talking about.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.