Around the time Obama became president is when they started giving cell phones from the program instead of just subsidizing landline phones. It happened before he was president but given the recession that took place while he was president it was regarded as the Obama phone because he was president when the majority of people got them.
Obama Phone Lady as evidence of fraud.... laughable.
I used to sell Lifeline phones into certain carriers back in 2009 - 2012 when I worked with various phone OEMs. I can see where some phone resellers could create some fraud.
But the government is not involved. They merely subsidize the program.
Just to be clear, I was not claiming that Obama phone lady was evidence of fraud. I was only pointing out it was a memorable moment during the 2012 election because that clip was replayed ad nauseam at the time. So I think people call them "Obama phones" because of a fairly successful campaign at pinning their existence or popularity on Barack Obama (where this woman credited her free phone to Obama), and this particular video clip was shown quite a bit at the time.
The fraud remark in my comment was about the other news video I linked and also a link to wikipedia. Free phones and phone plans are really, really low on my list of things I care about in terms of examples of bad governance in the US.
As someone who thinks free phones to those who need one is a good thing, and thinks Obama was generally a pretty good dude, I wouldn't automatically ready negative sentiment into those words.
Indeed, it should be a very good thing. In wise societies, the most honored are those who are poorest because they've given away the most to the people who need it (and are best at obtaining the resources to give away).
Gut to the right wing in today's society, anything that might be giving someone (especially non-white someones) a helping hand is basically a slur. See "Welfare Queens", "Obamacare", etc.. God forbid one tax penny go to help someone else, and they don't know and don't care whether any such helping programs actually help reduce costs.
One is from a wise society that values every member, and shuns those who hoard resources, recognizing their poverty of spirit.
The other is from a society which is far less wise but still knows enough to understand that a society where everyone contributes some resources to common goods will always build a better society than can result from any anarchy.
And then there are the people in the latter societies who somehow think that the benefits of everyone else's taxes, such as roads, legal system, public education system, clean food and water regulations, national defense, etc. are simply natural resources existing for their benefit and that they shouldn't have to contribute.
Those people are called freeloaders, and are recognized as a problem, so contributions are compulsory, and called taxes.
If you don't like taxes, it might be best go find a country that doesn't have them.
A quick search turns up none, but you can get close; there are five countries where the total tax revenue is less than 5% of their GDP: Syria (1.30%), Cuba (2.40%), South Sudan (3.10%), Nigeria (4.10%), and Burma (4.20%) [0].
I notice no exodus among the many people who claim to despise taxes to go to these places where taxes are minimal.
This is proof positive that the benefits that come with taxes (e.g., a working system of infrastructure, law, education, etc.) far outweigh the "freedom" from taxes.
Have you picked up an moved to a near-zero tax country? If not, maybe stop being a hypocrite whining about taxes and start appreciating the benefits that a higher tax and higher service society brings, of which you obviously prefer to take advantage.
Supporters often call the free phones "Obama phones" too. Just like Obamacare started off as a slur towards ACA, the party saw Obama's name as a way to link a benefit to Democrats and détourned it. It's like the Bush tax rebate or the Trump stimulus.
Comments
Critics often call the free phones Obama phones
Which Lifeline phones started in 1985 under Regan.
https://www.fcc.gov/general/lifeline-program-low-income-cons...
But it's easy to blame Obama.
Around the time Obama became president is when they started giving cell phones from the program instead of just subsidizing landline phones. It happened before he was president but given the recession that took place while he was president it was regarded as the Obama phone because he was president when the majority of people got them.
It was a relatively memorable moment of the 2012 election.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpAOwJvTOio
I had a note in this comment on fraud, but it looks like there was probably a consistent pattern of waste/fraud for a long time (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Service_Fund#Waste_a...). There were some proven accusations of fraud in 2012 as well: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rY4cy95VFes
Obama Phone Lady as evidence of fraud.... laughable.
I used to sell Lifeline phones into certain carriers back in 2009 - 2012 when I worked with various phone OEMs. I can see where some phone resellers could create some fraud.
But the government is not involved. They merely subsidize the program.
Just to be clear, I was not claiming that Obama phone lady was evidence of fraud. I was only pointing out it was a memorable moment during the 2012 election because that clip was replayed ad nauseam at the time. So I think people call them "Obama phones" because of a fairly successful campaign at pinning their existence or popularity on Barack Obama (where this woman credited her free phone to Obama), and this particular video clip was shown quite a bit at the time.
The fraud remark in my comment was about the other news video I linked and also a link to wikipedia. Free phones and phone plans are really, really low on my list of things I care about in terms of examples of bad governance in the US.
Such a strange twist of language.
As someone who thinks free phones to those who need one is a good thing, and thinks Obama was generally a pretty good dude, I wouldn't automatically ready negative sentiment into those words.
Indeed, it should be a very good thing. In wise societies, the most honored are those who are poorest because they've given away the most to the people who need it (and are best at obtaining the resources to give away).
Gut to the right wing in today's society, anything that might be giving someone (especially non-white someones) a helping hand is basically a slur. See "Welfare Queens", "Obamacare", etc.. God forbid one tax penny go to help someone else, and they don't know and don't care whether any such helping programs actually help reduce costs.
(yeah, let the downvotes begin)
One of these things is not like the other.
Yes.
One is from a wise society that values every member, and shuns those who hoard resources, recognizing their poverty of spirit.
The other is from a society which is far less wise but still knows enough to understand that a society where everyone contributes some resources to common goods will always build a better society than can result from any anarchy.
And then there are the people in the latter societies who somehow think that the benefits of everyone else's taxes, such as roads, legal system, public education system, clean food and water regulations, national defense, etc. are simply natural resources existing for their benefit and that they shouldn't have to contribute.
Those people are called freeloaders, and are recognized as a problem, so contributions are compulsory, and called taxes.
If you don't like taxes, it might be best go find a country that doesn't have them.
A quick search turns up none, but you can get close; there are five countries where the total tax revenue is less than 5% of their GDP: Syria (1.30%), Cuba (2.40%), South Sudan (3.10%), Nigeria (4.10%), and Burma (4.20%) [0].
I notice no exodus among the many people who claim to despise taxes to go to these places where taxes are minimal.
This is proof positive that the benefits that come with taxes (e.g., a working system of infrastructure, law, education, etc.) far outweigh the "freedom" from taxes.
Have you picked up an moved to a near-zero tax country? If not, maybe stop being a hypocrite whining about taxes and start appreciating the benefits that a higher tax and higher service society brings, of which you obviously prefer to take advantage.
[0] https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/the-countries-with-the-l...
Supporters often call the free phones "Obama phones" too. Just like Obamacare started off as a slur towards ACA, the party saw Obama's name as a way to link a benefit to Democrats and détourned it. It's like the Bush tax rebate or the Trump stimulus.