Wow this author is salty. Wait till they find out you can pay money for expedited passport renewal and for Group 1 boarding of the aircraft and for an Uber to pick you up 5 minutes early on the way to the airport.
I disagree with the author regarding their complains surrounding rich people going through life easier. Unfortunately that will always be possible and complaining about it muddied this article
However, I agree with the author that a private company should not be getting between me and my government. I am okay with TSA as long as it is my government making sure airports are safe. I am fine with paying more for expedited passports because that is a deal between me and my government. I am fine with expedited boarding because that never involved my government and it never should.
This is a situation, like the author said, that is similar to the intuit catastrophe. Paying CLEAR is equivalent (in the long term) to ensuring that no forward progress is made on simplifying and expediting airport security.
That’s a valuable distinction you are pointing out. I agree 100% in theory. For example, on certain municipal websites in New York City where I live, credit cards are not natively accepted for transactions, but a link is provided to an authorized private company who charges a non-trivial commission. This is problematic.
On the other hand though, I returned yesterday from a business trip to Israel, where taxes fund a highly functional and adequate healthcare system, but many well-to-do tech workers also pay for private health insurance which allows your family members to be seen almost immediately by a specialist when needed. I would be okay with this system in the United States as a compromise to supersede the dysfunctional system we have now.
Comments
Wow this author is salty. Wait till they find out you can pay money for expedited passport renewal and for Group 1 boarding of the aircraft and for an Uber to pick you up 5 minutes early on the way to the airport.
I disagree with the author regarding their complains surrounding rich people going through life easier. Unfortunately that will always be possible and complaining about it muddied this article
However, I agree with the author that a private company should not be getting between me and my government. I am okay with TSA as long as it is my government making sure airports are safe. I am fine with paying more for expedited passports because that is a deal between me and my government. I am fine with expedited boarding because that never involved my government and it never should.
This is a situation, like the author said, that is similar to the intuit catastrophe. Paying CLEAR is equivalent (in the long term) to ensuring that no forward progress is made on simplifying and expediting airport security.
That’s a valuable distinction you are pointing out. I agree 100% in theory. For example, on certain municipal websites in New York City where I live, credit cards are not natively accepted for transactions, but a link is provided to an authorized private company who charges a non-trivial commission. This is problematic.
On the other hand though, I returned yesterday from a business trip to Israel, where taxes fund a highly functional and adequate healthcare system, but many well-to-do tech workers also pay for private health insurance which allows your family members to be seen almost immediately by a specialist when needed. I would be okay with this system in the United States as a compromise to supersede the dysfunctional system we have now.
Can you? Not in my country of residence.
That's not a monopoly - you're free to choose any airline you want if you want to pay them for extra service.
Once again, you as the consumer have a choice of supplier.
I don't really understand the appeal of early boarding. I want to spend as little time on the plane as possible.