It's obviously unimportant or you wouldn't have happily paid for it.
Giving away code to a paid app while it is viable and thriving offers no benefit to the producer except to allow anyone and everyone to duplicate their app and create knock-offs. The right "eyeballs" will never look at it because of Tragedy of the Commons.
It is important to me, and if I was aware of an open-source Obsidian equivalent, I would have chosen that. But there wasn't, and AFAIK there still isn't one.
Having a good tool that works well for my purpose is more important, yes. So I still happily pay for it.
no benefit to the producer
Perhaps...? But the producer isn't who I care about here; I'm the user.
Comments
Happy paying Obsidian user here: Obsidian isn’t open source. That alone is reason enough.
All else being equal (which, yes, is unlikely) an exact clone of Obsidian would be “better”.
It's obviously unimportant or you wouldn't have happily paid for it.
Giving away code to a paid app while it is viable and thriving offers no benefit to the producer except to allow anyone and everyone to duplicate their app and create knock-offs. The right "eyeballs" will never look at it because of Tragedy of the Commons.
Therefore, it's a wish but not a requirement.
Huh? How are you coming to that conclusion?
It is important to me, and if I was aware of an open-source Obsidian equivalent, I would have chosen that. But there wasn't, and AFAIK there still isn't one.
Having a good tool that works well for my purpose is more important, yes. So I still happily pay for it.
Perhaps...? But the producer isn't who I care about here; I'm the user.
Not necessarily. It could be important but the non-FOSS tool might be the best available.