Skip to content

Comment on HAProxy 2.7parent

Comments

IMO for super high packet rate cases, DPDK would make more sense. For proxy protocol injection, this would be fine since you don't really care about a lot of the TCP stack, just keeping track of new connections, and doing the sequence number rewriting to account for the injected bytes. All of the congestion control etc can be handled by the endpoints.

Of course if HAProxy performs well enough, then that's still a million times easier.

Yeah, I had lots of fun ideas, but had a time crunch, HAProxy basically just worked to get started, and took well to optimizing, and pretty soon I had more capacity that would ever be needed, and never had a chance to rebuild it with exotic technology ;)

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.