I think I need to adopt a practice where if I open an article, like the one you linked, and the title is some alternative take presented as a universal truth without qualification ("Git commits are useless"), I immediately stop reading. Not because I think they are always wrong, though that is usually how they read to me, but because they seemingly fail to demonstrate any humility - a characteristic I think is probably necessary for a balanced take landing closer to truth. (I did read the intro paragraph under the assumption the title was just clickbait but things don't improve).