Comment on Haskell: OOP vs type classesComments−gtani14yWell then, the expression problem. The guys who created scala and OCaml have opinions about this, no surprise (why not OOP and typeclasses?http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2807629/handling-incremen...(message 20) http://groups.google.com/group/scala-debate/browse_frm/threa...http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/4400---------------and "ADT" i think real world haskell is correct in reservign this for abstract data typeshttp://book.realworldhaskell.org/read/defining-types-streaml...
Comments
Well then, the expression problem. The guys who created scala and OCaml have opinions about this, no surprise (why not OOP and typeclasses?
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2807629/handling-incremen...
(message 20) http://groups.google.com/group/scala-debate/browse_frm/threa...
http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/4400
---------------
and "ADT" i think real world haskell is correct in reservign this for abstract data types
http://book.realworldhaskell.org/read/defining-types-streaml...