Comment on 22-11-22 22:11:22parentComments−lcnPylGDnU4H9OF3yLooks like it would be defeated by the dreaded leap second.−SAI_Peregrinus3yThey're going away. Resolution 4 of the CGPM 2022[1]. They didn't want to deal with having to add a negative leap second, and it looks likely they'd have to if they didn't end them.[1] https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/64811223/Resolutions-20...−carl_dr3yI don't think so. It would be only year 2006 (which map to second 60) which could be a problem, and there wasn't a leap year in that year.
Comments
Looks like it would be defeated by the dreaded leap second.
They're going away. Resolution 4 of the CGPM 2022[1]. They didn't want to deal with having to add a negative leap second, and it looks likely they'd have to if they didn't end them.
[1] https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/64811223/Resolutions-20...
I don't think so. It would be only year 2006 (which map to second 60) which could be a problem, and there wasn't a leap year in that year.