Skip to content

Comment on Rethinking Virtualization for Backendsparent

Comments

The argument of size given in the article isn't very convincing, when images like Alpine exist

For a lot of uses you can go even smaller than Alpine. Static executables for example don't require standard Linux tools to operate. I expect WASI would be similar. Just drop the runtime and your Wasm files into a scratch container.

True. A static executable doesn't even need Linux in the first place, that can be done with a unikernel. It's a tradeoff about familiarity, size, performance, documentation and technical level.

Busybox or other distribution tools are there for debugging purposes.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.