I don't think this was a waste of time at all. In fact, I was thrilled to read about exactly who made some of these predictions. Especially the analyst who based his "projections" on a false rumor.
Accountability is a good thing. All the "pass-through" journalism, where sites simply take what other sites say and post it themselves, can easily obscure the source.
I did think the thing about the apostrophe was a bit over-the-top, though.
Comments
I don't think this was a waste of time at all. In fact, I was thrilled to read about exactly who made some of these predictions. Especially the analyst who based his "projections" on a false rumor. Accountability is a good thing. All the "pass-through" journalism, where sites simply take what other sites say and post it themselves, can easily obscure the source. I did think the thing about the apostrophe was a bit over-the-top, though.
Agreed - it's good to have posts like this one there to keep rumor mongers honest and confirmation bias at bay.