Just like credit reports, this also inverts the responsibility - you are responsible to get your information delisted as opposed to giving your explicit OK for it to be listed or appear in a search engine. It never ceases to amaze me, how if a bank lends to someone who pretends to be me, why is that my problem and why should my good name and reputation be soiled. Putting that onus on the defrauded consumer is really overlooking the fact that the bank or lender didn't do enough due diligence.
Comments
This is a psyop to make regulators and low-information users think it'll achieve anything.
Just like credit reports, this also inverts the responsibility - you are responsible to get your information delisted as opposed to giving your explicit OK for it to be listed or appear in a search engine. It never ceases to amaze me, how if a bank lends to someone who pretends to be me, why is that my problem and why should my good name and reputation be soiled. Putting that onus on the defrauded consumer is really overlooking the fact that the bank or lender didn't do enough due diligence.