Comment on The AT ProtocolComments−karmakaze3yOh they mean 'At'-protocol. I was thinking Hayes 'AT' commands.−whoopdedo3yWhich still lives on today in cellular networks. At least up to LTE, I haven't looked lately to see if they're sticking around for 5G.https://www.rfwireless-world.com/Terminology/modem-AT-comman...−rzzzt3yIf you are talking to one of those self-contained, postage stamp-sized GSM modules using a microcontroller, chances are there'll be a serial link to it, and it's listening to Hayes commands.−dapids3yIt's still there.−EarlKing3y/me looks at this content-free page and then reads your comment+++ATH0−bks3yATDT−1letterunixname3yATZ0E0M0L0&A0&D0&G0&K0&N1&U1ATDT@;684-767-2676 (or any 767-XXXX, 555-XXXX is also fun)
Comments
Oh they mean 'At'-protocol. I was thinking Hayes 'AT' commands.
Which still lives on today in cellular networks. At least up to LTE, I haven't looked lately to see if they're sticking around for 5G.
https://www.rfwireless-world.com/Terminology/modem-AT-comman...
If you are talking to one of those self-contained, postage stamp-sized GSM modules using a microcontroller, chances are there'll be a serial link to it, and it's listening to Hayes commands.
It's still there.
/me looks at this content-free page and then reads your comment
+++ATH0
ATDT
ATZ0E0M0L0&A0&D0&G0&K0&N1&U1
ATDT@;684-767-2676 (or any 767-XXXX, 555-XXXX is also fun)