Inventiveness and compellingness are orthogonal. Facebook's mobile applications are excellent. They don't feel like a crippled, compromised version of Facebook. They feel like Facebook. Instagram and Path have the opposite problem: their web interfaces are second-class.
Perhaps. But their web interfaces will improve. Both are pretty small companies that will grow.
My main question is: Will something that "feels like Facebook" be what people want on their phones indefinitely? Or will something that feels more like a mobile app/service take over?
Facebook's mobile apps do feel like mobile apps. Sure, Path is prettier, but claiming that it's significantly more usable than mobile Facebook requires some objective substantiation.
Comments
Inventiveness and compellingness are orthogonal. Facebook's mobile applications are excellent. They don't feel like a crippled, compromised version of Facebook. They feel like Facebook. Instagram and Path have the opposite problem: their web interfaces are second-class.
Perhaps. But their web interfaces will improve. Both are pretty small companies that will grow.
My main question is: Will something that "feels like Facebook" be what people want on their phones indefinitely? Or will something that feels more like a mobile app/service take over?
Facebook's mobile apps do feel like mobile apps. Sure, Path is prettier, but claiming that it's significantly more usable than mobile Facebook requires some objective substantiation.