The article is discussing software that is “unique, complex (and) substantial”, seeming to imply software that will be used for serious purposes where failure is a problem. Boring development sounds pretty good there.
Perhaps you are building software with lower consequences and/or higher tolerance of failure. In which case, by all means, have fun with that.
Comments
The article is discussing software that is “unique, complex (and) substantial”, seeming to imply software that will be used for serious purposes where failure is a problem. Boring development sounds pretty good there.
Perhaps you are building software with lower consequences and/or higher tolerance of failure. In which case, by all means, have fun with that.