Many. This is the exact problem with class warfare. Without evidence, it assumes that an overwhelming portion of a certain class is out to maximize their gains at the expense of everyone else. If you don't have a citation, your argument is invalid.
My responses to this will be minimal, as we're considerably off-topic.
Which is why people in your position latch onto phrases like class warfare. As long as you can show one member of the class who doesn't participate you act like you've disproved the concept in general.
If you need a cite for every sweet deal lobbyists have sought just to agree that the lobbying class is getting a sweeter deal than the rest of us, you're being intentionally obtuse.
Comments
Many. This is the exact problem with class warfare. Without evidence, it assumes that an overwhelming portion of a certain class is out to maximize their gains at the expense of everyone else. If you don't have a citation, your argument is invalid.
My responses to this will be minimal, as we're considerably off-topic.
Which is why people in your position latch onto phrases like class warfare. As long as you can show one member of the class who doesn't participate you act like you've disproved the concept in general.
If you need a cite for every sweet deal lobbyists have sought just to agree that the lobbying class is getting a sweeter deal than the rest of us, you're being intentionally obtuse.