We are currently updating these pages but we mainly differ with:
Our headless approach (REST API & Node.js client),
Lower Overhead & Higher Hit count limits,
Web IDE,
OSS,
Thundra APM integration,
Collaboration support,
Full On-premise solution with Web IDE support
sorry for being misleading, I was not trying to do so. About the first one I was referring to our own web UI, considering the plugins you are right.
2. one they weren't used to ship with a 3rd party IDE afaik, that's why I've said full on-prem with web ui. don't remember saying anything about the 3rd and the 4th, and it wasn't supposed to be something offensive to our competitors
Which implies the following bullet points are thing that sidekick has and Lightrun doesn't. Number 3 and 4 correspond to:
* Comprehensive language coverage (NodeJS, Java, Python)
All supported by Lightrun
* Enterprise features such as SSO, Workspace management, and more
Not sure what workspace management means but Lightrun supports a wide range of enterprise features and is deployed in Fortune 100 and major security conscious enterprises.
Comments
In addition to being OSS, Do you mind sharing the differentiation or with overlap w Lightrun and Rookout?
Yeah sure you can check out: https://www.runsidekick.com/rookout-comparison & https://www.runsidekick.com/lightrun-comparison
We are currently updating these pages but we mainly differ with: Our headless approach (REST API & Node.js client), Lower Overhead & Higher Hit count limits, Web IDE, OSS, Thundra APM integration, Collaboration support, Full On-premise solution with Web IDE support
more will come with this months updates
This isn't a comparison just a title and misleading bullets. Lightrun supports all these things and so much more.
* Lightrun supports web UI via VSCode.dev support
* Lightrun can be installed on-prem
* It supports all these 3 platforms and .net soon
* It supports SSO and quite a few features required by fortune 100 companies
sorry for being misleading, I was not trying to do so. About the first one I was referring to our own web UI, considering the plugins you are right. 2. one they weren't used to ship with a 3rd party IDE afaik, that's why I've said full on-prem with web ui. don't remember saying anything about the 3rd and the 4th, and it wasn't supposed to be something offensive to our competitors
The site says:
Which implies the following bullet points are thing that sidekick has and Lightrun doesn't. Number 3 and 4 correspond to:
* Comprehensive language coverage (NodeJS, Java, Python)
All supported by Lightrun
* Enterprise features such as SSO, Workspace management, and more
Not sure what workspace management means but Lightrun supports a wide range of enterprise features and is deployed in Fortune 100 and major security conscious enterprises.
also you can read our benchmark results: https://medium.com/runsidekick/sidekick-blog-production-debu...