Skip to content

Comment on Formally Verifying Rust's Opaque Typesparent

Comments

Thanks for the feedback, I should have spent more time connecting the logic statement to the equivalent rust syntax as you’re right the post has a weird audience problem otherwise. You either already know logic well enough that the proof is trivial, or it doesn’t make any sense.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.